guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#state-of-mayflower-v-datosok22
This is the start of #state-of-mayflower-v-datosok22 channel.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-31 02:50 a.m.
New Case
Case Type
Criminal
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
krabzkrabz used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-31 02:09 p.m.
Case Modified
@krabz has added @lachie to the case channel.
krabz
krabz 2025-03-31 02:09 p.m.
@meowiitten
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 02:11 p.m.
@lachie
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 02:11 p.m.
Not how that works
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 02:11 p.m.
You have to break it up into two separate counts even if it's the same statute being violated
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 03:27 p.m.
COUNT FOUR - 1 M.S.C. § 2302 - ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON on TWO counts OFFENSE TYPE - FELONY AGAINST DEFENDANT - datosok22 On or about March 11th, 2025, at the Mersea Car Dealership, MF, Defendant datosok22 allegedly committed 1 M.S.C. § 2302 - ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON, a FELONY offence,...
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 03:27 p.m.
Please view my annotations
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 03:27 p.m.
Ask me questions if you are confused
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 03:28 p.m.
(I only did one count but this should be applied uniformly to every count)(edited)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-03-31 03:28 p.m.
Count Four was just the worst example
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Count Four was just the worst example
lachie
lachie 2025-03-31 05:11 p.m.
Apologies
lachie
lachie 2025-03-31 05:11 p.m.
At school today but will amend later tonight
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
lachie
lachie 2025-04-01 03:35 a.m.
yeah because some judges dont like when i do js the neccessity and want more unnecasary stuff
lachie
lachie 2025-04-01 03:35 a.m.
but i agree with you
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-03 10:04 p.m.
@lachie Any updates?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@lachie Any updates?
lachie
lachie 2025-04-03 10:09 p.m.
ammending now
lachie
lachie 2025-04-05 08:24 p.m.
Courtesy copy, state apologies for the delay and appreciates your patience.
@meowiitten
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-05 08:25 p.m.
@lachie Are you online
lachie
lachie 2025-04-05 08:25 p.m.
Yes?
lachie
lachie 2025-04-05 08:28 p.m.
@meowiitten
lachielachie
@meowiitten
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-07 02:32 a.m.
Draft the summons
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Draft the summons
lachie
lachie 2025-04-07 07:21 a.m.
lachie
lachie 2025-04-07 07:21 a.m.
cc: @meowiitten
lachielachie
Click to see attachment.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-09 07:43 p.m.
@Sheriff of Clark County @Prothonotary of Court Please serve this/direct this to be served
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-10 12:40 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @opala to the case channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:40 p.m.
@opala
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 12:42 p.m.
@opala Before we proceed, I must ensure you understand your rights in this matter:

1. You have the right to remain silent. This means you do not have to speak or provide any information that could incriminate you.

2. You also have the right to have an attorney present during any questioning or legal proceedings. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you at no cost.

3. You have the right to a fair and public trial, where evidence will be presented, and witnesses can be called to testify on your behalf.

4. Furthermore, you have the right to confront witnesses against you, meaning you can question them in court.

5. Finally, you have the right to appeal any conviction or sentence imposed upon you.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:33 p.m.
@opala The information charges you as follows:

COUNT ONE - 1 M.S.C. § 2101 - FIRST DEGREE MURDER
OFFENSE TYPE - FELONY
AGAINST DEFENDANT - datosok22
On or about March 11th, 2025, at the Mersea Car Dealership, MF, Defendant datosok22 allegedly
committed 1 M.S.C. § 2101 - FIRST DEGREE MURDER, a FELONY offence, as defined in the
Mayflower Criminal Code; “Any player who intentionally and maliciously kills another player with
premeditation, or who kills whilst in the commission of a felony, or who kills a uniformed or identifiable
civil servant in the commission of their duties, shall be guilty of a felony”. The defendant can be seen
shooting their firearm and killing a Trooper of the Mayflower State Police, WaryFN, while in the
commission of a felony, attempted murder, at Mersea Car Dealership.

COUNT TWO - 1 M.S.C. § 2102 - SECOND DEGREE MURDER
OFFENSE TYPE - FELONY
AGAINST DEFENDANT - datosok22
On or about March 11th, 2025, at the Mersea Car Dealership, MF, Defendant datosok22 allegedly
committed 1 M.S.C. § 2102 - SECOND DEGREE MURDER, a FELONY offence, as defined in the
Mayflower Criminal Code; “Any person who intentionally kills another person with intent to kill or commit
great bodily harm shall be guilty of a felony”. The defendant can be seen shooting their firearm at another
resident, gpo_eat, then killing gpo_eat, despite them not being a threat or posing any substantial risk.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@opala The information charges you as follows: COUNT ONE - 1 M.S.C. § 2101 - FIRST DEGREE MURDER OFFENSE TYPE - FELONY AGAINST DEFENDANT - datosok22 On or ...
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:33 p.m.
COUNT THREE - 1 M.S.C. § 7102 - DISCHARGING A FIREARM IN CITY LIMITS
OFFENSE TYPE - MISDEMEANOR
AGAINST DEFENDANT - datosok22
On or about March 11th, 2025, at the Mersea Car Dealership, MF, Defendant datosok22 allegedly
committed 1 M.S.C. § 7102 - DISCHARGING A FIREARM IN CITY LIMITS, a MISDEMEANOR
offence, as defined in the Mayflower Criminal Code; “Any person who discharges a firearm within the
Cities of Lander or Mersea, except when lawfully defending themselves, is guilty of a misdemeanor”. The
defendant can be seen discharging their firearm within the City of Mersea at Mersea Car Dealership at a
responding Mayflower State Police Trooper, WaryFN. This shows the defendant was not defending himself
from any threat.

COUNT FOUR - 1 M.S.C. § 2302 - ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON
OFFENSE TYPE - FELONY
AGAINST DEFENDANT - datosok22
On or about March 11th, 2025, at the Mersea Car Dealership, MF, Defendant datosok22 allegedly
committed 1 M.S.C. § 2302 - ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON, a FELONY offence, as the
defendant can be seen shooting their firearm at another resident, gpo_eat, killing him. The defendant can be
seen shooting their firearm at another individual, and killing a Trooper of the Mayflower State Police,
WaryFN. The defendant had a firearm capable of causing severe harm and death. The actions of the
defendant show that they possessed an object capable of causing severe harm to a person, in they assaulted
the individual, WaryFN.
(edited)
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
COUNT THREE - 1 M.S.C. § 7102 - DISCHARGING A FIREARM IN CITY LIMITS OFFENSE TYPE - MISDEMEANOR AGAINST DEFENDANT - datosok22 On or about March 11th, 2025, at the Mersea Ca...(edited)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:34 p.m.
COUNT FIVE - 1 M.S.C. § 2302 - ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON
OFFENSE TYPE - FELONY
AGAINST DEFENDANT - datosok22
On or about March 11th, 2025, at the Mersea Car Dealership, MF, Defendant datosok22 allegedly
committed 1 M.S.C. § 2302 - ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON, a FELONY offence, as the
defendant can be seen shooting their firearm at another individual, and killing a Trooper of the Mayflower
State Police, WaryFN. The defendant had a firearm capable of causing severe harm and death. The actions
of the defendant show that they possessed an object capable of causing severe harm to a person, in which
they assaulted the individual, gpo_eat.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:34 p.m.
@opala How do you plead as to Count One?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:34 p.m.
@opala How do you plead as to Count Two?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:34 p.m.
@opala How do you plead as to Count Three?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:34 p.m.
@opala How do you plead as to Count Four?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:34 p.m.
@opala How do you plead as to Count Five?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:35 p.m.
Okay, I'll take the no response as NG
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:35 p.m.
MINUTE ENTRY: Return on Summons/Initial Appearance/Arraignment as to Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 held on 4/10/2025. DATOSOK22 appeared. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered as to Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:36 p.m.
PAPERLESS ORDER: It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court confirms the State's obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence—namely, evidence that favors the defendant or casts doubt on the State's case—as required by the principles established in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. The State is hereby ORDERED to fulfill this obligation. The State has a duty to disclose any evidence that negates the defendant's guilt, affects the credibility of a witness, or could potentially reduce a sentence. The defendant is entitled to this information without needing to make a request. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, dismissal of the information, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. Signed by Judge sadoimpacto on 4/10/2025.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-10 07:37 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @polyrabies to the case channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-10 07:37 p.m.
PAPERLESS STANDING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY ORDER: All parties are ordered to adhere to the following pretrial timelines. The pretrial window will close ten (10) days from April 10, 2025, concluding on April 20, 2024 at 11:59 PM EST barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay. By April 15, 2025 at 11:59 PM EST, all parties must disclose a final draft of their exhibit lists and witness lists. Additionally, all motions in limine must be filed no later than seventy-two (72) hours before the trial, with any oppositions due twenty-four (24) hours following the filing of such motions. Trial briefs, if any, are to be submitted no later than forty-eight (48) hours before the trial. Signed by Judge sadoimpacto on 4/10/2025.
@lachie @polyrabies @opala
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-16 04:14 p.m.
@lachie Where's your discovery?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@lachie Where's your discovery?
lachie
lachie 2025-04-16 07:26 p.m.
Will be filed by the end of today
lachie
lachie 2025-04-19 04:56 a.m.
@meowiitten Apologies for the late submission, issues with paralegals/IRL.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
lachie
lachie 2025-04-26 09:01 a.m.
@meowiitten
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-26 09:45 a.m.
SCHEDULING ORDER: This matter is set for trial on April 27, 2025, at 5:00 PM Eastern Time, to be conducted asynchronously.
@lachie @polyrabies
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
SCHEDULING ORDER: This matter is set for trial on April 27, 2025, at 5:00 PM Eastern Time, to be conducted asynchronously. @lachie @polyrabies
lachie
lachie 2025-04-26 07:49 p.m.
Unfortunately, that translates to Monday, April 28, 2025, at 7:00 AM on a school morning.
lachielachie
Unfortunately, that translates to Monday, April 28, 2025, at 7:00 AM on a school morning.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-26 07:53 p.m.
What does that even mean?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
What does that even mean?
lachie
lachie 2025-04-26 08:35 p.m.
means i cannot attend
lachie
lachie 2025-04-26 08:35 p.m.
sorry i meant to add that.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-04-28 04:41 p.m.
@lachie Are you going to give your opening statements or no
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-01 12:14 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @Mlexus to the case channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-01 12:14 p.m.
@Mlexus Maybe you can be of assistance
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Mlexus Maybe you can be of assistance
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-01 05:53 p.m.
I will be your honour, I’d just like to inform the court my timezone is AEST which is likely to result in delayed answers
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-01 05:53 p.m.
Opening coming today.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-01 06:41 p.m.
@polyrabies
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 02:52 a.m.
omfa is poly defense counsel
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 02:53 a.m.
@polyrabies
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 03:26 a.m.
Opening Statement

Your Honour, I come here to inform the Court of a series of grievous, - criminal -, acts conducted by the Defendant, datosok22. I will be going count by count and talking about them briefly.

On counts one and two, First and Second Degree Murder respectively, the Defendant mecilessly began a spree of shootings at the Mersea Car Dealership. Here, he shot and killed a clearly marked State Trooper, WaryFN, whilst he was trying to stop the Defendant from killing another man. This man is a civilian by the name of gpo_eat, whom he eventually succeeded in shooting and killing despite the best efforts of Law Enforcement, committing Second Degree Murder in this act as it resulted in the death of gpo_eat.

In the campaign of acts by the Defendant that can only be described as a murderous rampage; the Defendant discharged his firearm within city limits multiple times. From audiovisual analysis, the State estimates at least around 22 shots fired from his gun alone, many of which missed thanks to his abhorrent aim with this firearm, displaying incompetence when managing weapons. Onto the last counts, count four and five, assault with a deadly weapon, the Defendant clearly and undeniably used his firearm and shot at numerous individuals. His firearm is a deadly weapon, and he assaulted them through shooting at the two victims.

The Defendant in this court is a murderer that deserves to have the highest punishment afforded to them by law, four counts have been presented to this court that are airtight and accompanied with video evidence. If need be, witness testimony as well.

cc: @meowiitten @polyrabies @opala
(edited)
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 03:56 a.m.
state is open to a ingame larp session if court and counsel agree to a time
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 03:56 a.m.
im aware of the fact defense counsel shares the same timezone as both of the state attorneys in this case not sure about judge
MlexusMlexus
state is open to a ingame larp session if court and counsel agree to a time
polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-05-02 03:58 a.m.
sorry i cant do that rn im on holiday to chicago illinois
polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-05-02 03:59 a.m.
and my time is 9 hours ahea
polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-05-02 03:59 a.m.
d
polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-05-02 03:59 a.m.
of urs
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 03:59 a.m.
whattt i thought u were aussie
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 03:59 a.m.
oh right ur 9 hours ahead damn im stupid
polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-05-02 03:59 a.m.
I'm not in australia rn
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 03:59 a.m.
ok gng how long is ur holiday
polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-05-02 03:59 a.m.
4 weeks
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 03:59 a.m.
from now?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 05:59 a.m.
@polyrabies do u wanna re-assign this to a ( tuah ) nother PD
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 05:59 a.m.
so that ur client can have a speedy trial
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 05:59 a.m.
:😊:
polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-05-02 05:59 a.m.
No.
polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-05-02 05:59 a.m.
We can just do it over discord.
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 05:59 a.m.
will u be able to file motions and the like
polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-05-02 06:00 a.m.
Of course
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 06:00 a.m.
ok then
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 06:00 a.m.
fyi u needa do ur opening statement since i did mine
polyrabies
polyrabies 2025-05-02 06:01 a.m.
It will be done within 92 hours.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
polyrabiespolyrabies
It will be done within 92 hours.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-02 08:53 p.m.
Seriously?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 09:08 p.m.
thats what im saying but fingers crossed :🤞: :🙏:
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-02 09:10 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has removed @polyrabies from the case channel.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-02 09:14 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @bob78711new to the case channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-02 09:14 p.m.
@bob78711new
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-02 09:14 p.m.
How long do you need? Need opening statements ASAP
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-02 09:14 p.m.
Or you can waive them and then jump in on cross-examination when the state calls their witness
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Or you can waive them and then jump in on cross-examination when the state calls their witness
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-02 09:34 p.m.
lets just wave
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-02 09:34 p.m.
@Mlexus Please call your first witness
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Mlexus Please call your first witness
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 09:42 p.m.
I call Brandonnluv ( brandon1864 discord ) to the stand
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 09:42 p.m.
sorry your honour im in a mng bct rn i will ask questions in like 30 minutes when it finishes
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 09:42 p.m.
or i will try multi task
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-02 09:43 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @Brandon to the case channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-02 09:43 p.m.
@Brandon Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Brandon Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-02 09:50 p.m.
I do
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-02 09:51 p.m.
@Mlexus Go ahead
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 09:51 p.m.
in bct sorry i will when done
MlexusMlexus
in bct sorry i will when done
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-02 10:10 p.m.
can vouch
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-02 10:10 p.m.
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 10:11 p.m.
thats me in front row!!
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 10:11 p.m.
centre-left from that pov
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 10:13 p.m.
do we want to try and schedule an in person hearing after this or in the very near future?
cc @bob78711new @meowiitten @Brandon
MlexusMlexus
do we want to try and schedule an in person hearing after this or in the very near future? cc @bob78711new @meowiitten @Brandon
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-02 10:13 p.m.
yeah
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-02 10:13 p.m.
that gives me more time to catch up
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-02 10:14 p.m.
No
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-02 10:14 p.m.
Please stop with the side comments
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-02 10:14 p.m.
Your honor I was agreeing with the prosecution as it would be benificial to these proceedings.
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 10:15 p.m.
I think his honor was directing that comment to me
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-02 10:15 p.m.
I am a bit hesitant to push through a rushed trial when counsel just changed, it could lead to ineffective counsel and my clients rights being violated.
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-02 10:15 p.m.
Ah I see.
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 10:15 p.m.
Apologies to the court will refrain in future
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-02 10:54 p.m.
@Brandon Please state your roblox username and rank in law enforcement for the court.
MlexusMlexus
@Brandon Please state your roblox username and rank in law enforcement for the court.
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-03 01:27 a.m.
BrandonnLUV , MBI Agent in Training
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 01:32 a.m.
i will be very very brief in this testimony given concrete evidence so this shouldn't take too long
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 01:32 a.m.
@Brandon you are the one who produced this video ( exhibit A of evidence ), yes?
link: v
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 01:33 a.m.
mistake i tried to ctrl+v and only got v, apologies
MlexusMlexus
@Brandon you are the one who produced this video ( exhibit A of evidence ), yes? link: v
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-03 01:46 a.m.
Yes
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 01:48 a.m.
ok, at the start of this video you enabled your emergency lights and sirens
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 01:48 a.m.
why did you do this
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 01:50 a.m.
@Brandon
MlexusMlexus
@Brandon
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-03 01:51 a.m.
I heard gunshots in the area
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 01:52 a.m.
ok, and then you drove your car with ELS to the scene and saw two individuals, gpo_eat and the defendant, engaged in a shootout, correct?
MlexusMlexus
ok, and then you drove your car with ELS to the scene and saw two individuals, gpo_eat and the defendant, engaged in a shootout, correct?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-03 01:53 a.m.
Correct
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 01:55 a.m.
I noticed in this video you did not fire any shots at the defendant nor victim 1 ( gpo_eat ) whilst they were engaged in their shootout, why is this?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 09:56 p.m.
@Brandon
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-03 11:10 p.m.
I was unsure who was legally defending themselves, so I didn’t want to shoot and kill someone wrongfully
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-03 11:10 p.m.
@Mlexus
BrandonBrandon
I was unsure who was legally defending themselves, so I didn’t want to shoot and kill someone wrongfully
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 11:18 p.m.
Thank you, after the defendant shot and killed gpo_eat, a State Trooper arrived. What did the Defendant do to the state trooper as shown in the video and what was your immediate response?
MlexusMlexus
Thank you, after the defendant shot and killed gpo_eat, a State Trooper arrived. What did the Defendant do to the state trooper as shown in the video and what was your immediate re...
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-03 11:22 p.m.
The defendant then shot and killed the state trooper with their firearm. My immediate response was I used my firearm and killed the defendant
BrandonBrandon
The defendant then shot and killed the state trooper with their firearm. My immediate response was I used my firearm and killed the defendant
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 11:23 p.m.
How do you know that the Defendant, datosok22, is the man who killed gpo_eat and WaryFN?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 11:23 p.m.
WaryFN being the State Trooper.
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-03 11:25 p.m.
After the defendant died, I got their identification off their dead body by using the “ search for ID” gui
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-03 11:25 p.m.
@Mlexus
BrandonBrandon
After the defendant died, I got their identification off their dead body by using the “ search for ID” gui
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 11:28 p.m.
So, on the 11th of March at ~2:50 PM the Defendant, who was properly identified as datosok22 by you, shot and killed gpo_eat, a civilian and proceeded to shoot and kill WaryFN, a State Trooper who was in a clearly marked Department Vehicle. Would this be a correct statement?
MlexusMlexus
So, on the 11th of March at ~2:50 PM the Defendant, who was properly identified as datosok22 by you, shot and killed gpo_eat, a civilian and proceeded to shoot and kill WaryFN, a S...
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-03 11:29 p.m.
Yes , it is a correct statement
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 11:29 p.m.
That would conclude my very very few questions given the strength of Exhibit A, thank you very much.
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-03 11:29 p.m.
@meowiitten cross @bob78711new
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-03 11:35 p.m.
@bob78711new Proceed
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@bob78711new Proceed
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 01:32 a.m.
Apologies have been busy will proceed in a few
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 01:38 a.m.
@Brandon You stated earlier you were unsure who was legally defending themselves, correct?
bob78711newbob78711new
@Brandon You stated earlier you were unsure who was legally defending themselves, correct?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:39 a.m.
Correct
BrandonBrandon
Correct
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 01:39 a.m.
So, at the moment you saw the shooting between the two individuals, you could not definitively say who fired first?
bob78711newbob78711new
So, at the moment you saw the shooting between the two individuals, you could not definitively say who fired first?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:40 a.m.
That is correct , I could not
BrandonBrandon
That is correct , I could not
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 01:42 a.m.
Is it possible the defendant was returning fire after being shot at?
bob78711newbob78711new
Is it possible the defendant was returning fire after being shot at?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:42 a.m.
That could be a possibility
BrandonBrandon
That could be a possibility
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 01:42 a.m.
Did you hear any commands or warnings given before either individual opened fire?
bob78711newbob78711new
Did you hear any commands or warnings given before either individual opened fire?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:43 a.m.
What do you mean ?
BrandonBrandon
What do you mean ?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 01:44 a.m.
Did either side tell each other not to shoot or back off
bob78711newbob78711new
Did either side tell each other not to shoot or back off
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:45 a.m.
No
BrandonBrandon
No
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 01:47 a.m.
So you didn’t observe whether gpo_eat posed a threat to the defendant before the defendant fired?
bob78711newbob78711new
So you didn’t observe whether gpo_eat posed a threat to the defendant before the defendant fired?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:50 a.m.
When I pulled up to the scene both gpo_eat and the defendant had their guns out and began shooting at eachother. I could not know who was legally defending themselves in that moment
BrandonBrandon
When I pulled up to the scene both gpo_eat and the defendant had their guns out and began shooting at eachother. I could not know who was legally defending themselves in that momen...
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 01:50 a.m.
Since you heard shots before arriving and didn’t witness the start of the encounter, your testimony can’t rule out lawful self-defense, correct?
bob78711newbob78711new
Since you heard shots before arriving and didn’t witness the start of the encounter, your testimony can’t rule out lawful self-defense, correct?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:53 a.m.
I suppose that is correct, though I do wonder why the defendant would then murder a State Trooper if they were lawfully defending themselves.
BrandonBrandon
I suppose that is correct, though I do wonder why the defendant would then murder a State Trooper if they were lawfully defending themselves.
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 01:55 a.m.
Isn’t it true that in fast-moving, high-stress situations, it’s difficult to distinguish between aggressor and defender unless you saw the entire encounter unfold?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 01:58 a.m.
@Brandon
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:59 a.m.
Id say that is true yes, more specifically between two citizens or residents/ tourists
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 01:59 a.m.
@bob78711new
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:02 a.m.
So to be clear, you arrived after the confrontation began, couldn’t tell who started it, and you admit it’s difficult to determine who’s lawfully defending themselves in situations like this—especially between civilians. Based on that, you can’t say under oath the defendant was not acting in self-defense at that moment, can you?
bob78711newbob78711new
So to be clear, you arrived after the confrontation began, couldn’t tell who started it, and you admit it’s difficult to determine who’s lawfully defending themselves in situations...
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:06 a.m.
For the killing of gpo_eat , no I cannot .
BrandonBrandon
For the killing of gpo_eat , no I cannot .
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:08 a.m.
Alright, moving on, you testified that the Trooper arrived with lights and sirens, correct?
bob78711newbob78711new
Alright, moving on, you testified that the Trooper arrived with lights and sirens, correct?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:11 a.m.
Correct
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:11 a.m.
hi correction
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:11 a.m.
i said ELS
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:11 a.m.
whilst that is commonly intended as emergency lights and sirens and that is trve that is an abbreviation
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:12 a.m.
commonly its just used to refer to lights or sirens or both
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:12 a.m.
tripping him up and saying " but he didn't have sirens " ( which is true, waryfn didn't ahve sirens on ) i
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:12 a.m.
Counsel
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:12 a.m.
is just iffy
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:12 a.m.
Your or of line
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:12 a.m.
Out of line*
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:13 a.m.
im informing you that in law enforcement circles ELS is used very very commonly to refer to just lights or sirens and maybe even both, we are deposing a witness who was and is a law enforcement officer at the time and I asked " you arrived with ELS " to which he responded yes
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:13 a.m.
it is clear your trying to trip him up on that
MlexusMlexus
im informing you that in law enforcement circles ELS is used very very commonly to refer to just lights or sirens and maybe even both, we are deposing a witness who was and is a la...
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:13 a.m.
If he is a law enforcement officer he would be able to identify that
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:13 a.m.
May I proceed or is there more?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:14 a.m.
No the point is that in law enforcement a lot of officers and even non-officers like myself refer to the term ELS as just lights or sirens or both
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:14 a.m.
nothing else
BrandonBrandon
Correct
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:15 a.m.
oh and move to strike I said ELS and replied in the affirmative, not lights and sirens
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:15 a.m.
basis is with my aforementioned reasoning of ELS referring to lights or sirens or both
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:16 a.m.
do u agree or do we wait for sado
MlexusMlexus
do u agree or do we wait for sado
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:16 a.m.
We can pause that line of questioning for now while I ask other questions
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:17 a.m.
be careful with your line of questioning as it may result in being a waste of time if the question i replied to is eventually stricken, but go on
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:17 a.m.
@Brandon There is a long gap between my questions and your answers, on average 3 minutes give or take, is your testimony not your own, or to rephrase are you being assisted by anyone while I ask my simple yes/no questions
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:18 a.m.
It’s 2 am for me and I’m on my phone , no I am not being assisted in anyway , I am just tired
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:18 a.m.
bob if your concerned
MlexusMlexus
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:19 a.m.
This does not preclude other people
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:19 a.m.
fair, go on
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:19 a.m.
I kindly ask you stop interrupting my questions
BrandonBrandon
It’s 2 am for me and I’m on my phone , no I am not being assisted in anyway , I am just tired
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:23 a.m.
Alright, I did not see this
bob78711newbob78711new
Alright, moving on, you testified that the Trooper arrived with lights and sirens, correct?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:23 a.m.
Continuing on from here omitting the ELS part, you also stated the Trooper never exited the vehicle, correct?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:25 a.m.
objection elusive
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:25 a.m.
said " WaryFN, a State Trooper who was in a clearly marked Department Vehicle. ", the keyword here being " was ".
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:26 a.m.
which is true, WaryFN was in his clearly marked department vehicle though exited as seen in the video for half a second before getting gunned down
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:26 a.m.
be more careful with your questions please and dont try to trip him up
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:26 a.m.
do u agree or do we wait for sado
MlexusMlexus
do u agree or do we wait for sado
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:27 a.m.
I agree
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:27 a.m.
:👍:
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:27 a.m.
@Brandon At no point did you hear the Trooper state any commands, identify himself, or order the defendant to stop, did you?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:31 a.m.
The trooper pulled up in a marked State Police car with clear ELS. The defendant shot and killed the Trooper very quickly after he arrived on the scene, I don’t see how the trooper would’ve been able say any of that.
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:31 a.m.
@bob78711new
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:32 a.m.
The defendant was just in a gunfight seconds earlier, right?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:32 a.m.
Correct
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:33 a.m.
The defendant was just in a gunfight seconds earlier, right?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:33 a.m.
copy paste happens to the best of us
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:34 a.m.
lol
bob78711newbob78711new
The defendant was just in a gunfight seconds earlier, right?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:34 a.m.
Don’t answer this
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:34 a.m.
In that kind of situation, where shots are being fired and a car pulls up rapidly with lights and sirens, it’s possible the defendant perceived an incoming threat, isn’t it?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:34 a.m.
objection
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:34 a.m.
how is defense counsel meant to know the state of mind of the defendant and percieve a state law enforcement officer coming to a scene where there was just a shootout
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:35 a.m.
defense counsel i mean defendant
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:35 a.m.
i mean
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:35 a.m.
holy i cant apologies im really tired
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:35 a.m.
the witness
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:35 a.m.
how is the witness meant to know the state of mind*
MlexusMlexus
how is the witness meant to know the state of mind*
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:36 a.m.
Police officers face violence on a daily basis
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:36 a.m.
Is this not true in Clark county?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:36 a.m.
yes,
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:37 a.m.
however; the defendant is not a law enforcement officer, how is the witness meant to know the state of mind or know how the defendant could have percieve a peace officer arriving to a scene where shots were fired?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:37 a.m.
do you see what im trying to say counsel
MlexusMlexus
however; the defendant is not a law enforcement officer, how is the witness meant to know the state of mind or know how the defendant could have percieve a peace officer arrivi...
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:38 a.m.
I am asking the defendant as to his experience
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:39 a.m.
To me , no that is not possible. That doesn’t make any sense. Any law abiding citizen would’ve seen the State Police car and wouldn’t have perceived it as an incoming threat. The defendant also was brandishing their firearm after the gunfight with gpo_eat was over, which further proves my point of how this can not be a possibility. If the defendant did nothing wrong, he wouldn’t have shot the Trooper.
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:39 a.m.
i was abt to say i withdraw my objection
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:39 a.m.
but yeah i withdraw my objection the answer is valid
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:43 a.m.
I also wanna add in my experience , a law abiding citizen who has done nothing wrong or plans to do nothing wrong, in this situation where they just got out of a gunfight of claimed self defense would’ve stopped brandishing and attempted to speak to the Trooper instead of opening fire.
BrandonBrandon
I also wanna add in my experience , a law abiding citizen who has done nothing wrong or plans to do nothing wrong, in this situation where they just got out of a gunfight of claime...
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:44 a.m.
You understand that it’s not your job to determine guilt or innocence in this courtroom, correct?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:45 a.m.
Ok
BrandonBrandon
Ok
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:45 a.m.
Yes or no please
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:45 a.m.
Correct
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:46 a.m.
You’re not a mental health expert, are you?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:46 a.m.
No
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:46 a.m.
You don’t have access to what the defendant was thinking at the time of the shooting, do you?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:47 a.m.
No
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:48 a.m.
Is it unusual for someone who’s just been in a shootout to still be holding their firearm while they assess the situation around them?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:49 a.m.
I remind counsel that they asked if the Witness, in their experience as a LEO thinks the Defendant could have perceived the trooper arriving as a threat, the witness responded that ( paraphrasing ) in his experience and expertise as a LEO he doesn’t think the defendant could at all of perceived the trooper arriving as a threat unless he ( the defendant ) was defending himself
MlexusMlexus
I remind counsel that they asked if the Witness, in their experience as a LEO thinks the Defendant could have perceived the trooper arriving as a threat, the witness responded that...
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:49 a.m.
Counselor you are out of line
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:49 a.m.
Unless you have an object
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 02:49 a.m.
Ok go on
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:49 a.m.
Motion to strike
bob78711newbob78711new
Is it unusual for someone who’s just been in a shootout to still be holding their firearm while they assess the situation around them?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:50 a.m.
@Brandon please answer
bob78711newbob78711new
@Brandon please answer
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:53 a.m.
No
BrandonBrandon
No
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:53 a.m.
Wouldn’t you agree that lowering your firearm while gunshots are still ringing out could expose you to danger?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:55 a.m.
Yes
BrandonBrandon
Yes
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:56 a.m.
So holding a weapon does not necessarily mean someone intends to shoot again, does it?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 02:57 a.m.
Depends on the situation
BrandonBrandon
Depends on the situation
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 02:58 a.m.
So you agree, then, that some innocent people can make mistakes in dangerous situations?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 03:01 a.m.
Depends on the situation and what is happening / happened . In this situation no , I don’t agree.
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 03:02 a.m.
Pertaining to the defendant that is
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 03:04 a.m.
So it’s your position that if someone makes a mistake in a shootout, they must be guilty?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 03:06 a.m.
Like I said , depends on the situation , what is happening / happened in the situation. I cannot give a straight yes or no answer to that
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 03:07 a.m.
Do you believe that stress or confusion during a gunfight excuses any kind of reaction?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 03:08 a.m.
No
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 03:09 a.m.
Isn’t it true that the law recognizes imperfect self-defense as a possibility in cases like this?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 03:10 a.m.
In real life perhaps, I’m not too sure about how Clark applies that.
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-04 03:13 a.m.
But if we’re speaking possibilities , yes it could be a possibility in certain cases in Clark. I dont think that applies to this case though.
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 03:20 a.m.
@Mlexus was discovery submitted?
bob78711newbob78711new
@Mlexus was discovery submitted?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 03:58 a.m.
not by me by the main counsel @lachie but yeah it’s in pins
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 03:58 a.m.
sorry was at church
MlexusMlexus
not by me by the main counsel @lachie but yeah it’s in pins
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 04:02 a.m.
Ah I see
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 04:02 a.m.
It was not added to the Trello
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 04:02 a.m.
It’s late for me so let’s pause for the night
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-04 04:02 a.m.
And I will continue tomorrow
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 04:03 a.m.
:👍:
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 04:04 a.m.
i’ve got excursion tmr to supreme court of my state and i won’t have phone for 7-8 feel free to continue in my absence and i’ll respond with any potential objections then
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-04 04:04 a.m.
7-8 hours*
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-07 02:52 a.m.
@Mlexus
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-07 02:52 a.m.
Continue
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Mlexus
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-07 02:53 a.m.
bob didnt finish
bob78711newbob78711new
It’s late for me so let’s pause for the night
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-07 02:53 a.m.
he paused
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-07 02:54 a.m.
@bob78711new My mistake
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-07 02:54 a.m.
You continue please
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-07 11:40 a.m.
@meowiitten @Mlexus has the video been authenticated
bob78711newbob78711new
@meowiitten @Mlexus has the video been authenticated
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-07 12:03 p.m.
Exhibit A has
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Exhibit A has
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-07 01:48 p.m.
Alright thank you, I will continue tonight
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-08 04:53 p.m.
Apologies for not continuing I have AP testing and this weekend is Mother’s Day weekend so I will be out of town, @meowiitten @Mlexus can we adjourn till next Monday?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-08 04:53 p.m.
Nope
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-08 04:53 p.m.
Just continue when ready
bob78711newbob78711new
Apologies for not continuing I have AP testing and this weekend is Mother’s Day weekend so I will be out of town, @meowiitten @Mlexus can we adjourn till ne...
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-13 08:15 a.m.
its nearly wednesday u ready
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-15 07:05 p.m.
@bob78711new
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@bob78711new
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-15 07:06 p.m.
apologies
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-15 07:06 p.m.
I have an AP Physics Exam TOMORROW
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-15 07:06 p.m.
Let me kill myself then we can resume on saturday?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-15 07:06 p.m.
Ok
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-17 06:19 p.m.
@bob78711new i hope u get full marks on ur ap physics exam :😊: and i also hope i get full prison time for ur client
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-17 06:19 p.m.
are u ready
MlexusMlexus
are u ready
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-17 06:28 p.m.
yeah
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-17 06:28 p.m.
@Brandon are you available to continue?
bob78711newbob78711new
@Brandon are you available to continue?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-17 06:41 p.m.
Yea I’m at work but I’m on mobile so I’m good
BrandonBrandon
Yea I’m at work but I’m on mobile so I’m good
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-17 06:56 p.m.
LMK when you get off
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-17 06:57 p.m.
we can do it then
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-18 06:57 p.m.
@Brandon i don’t think you can work 24 hours straight u good?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-18 07:12 p.m.
I fell asleep last night got home at 11 pm I basically get home around that time everyday we can continue rn I’ll try my best to respond
bob78711newbob78711new
LMK when you get off
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-18 07:13 p.m.
We may continue
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-20 05:26 a.m.
@bob78711new
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 11:44 a.m.
@bob78711new
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@bob78711new
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-20 01:02 p.m.
I’m in class
BrandonBrandon
But if we’re speaking possibilities , yes it could be a possibility in certain cases in Clark. I dont think that applies to this case though.
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-20 02:53 p.m.
It does but, Would you agree that deciding whether a person intended to commit murder is for the jury not for you?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-20 02:53 p.m.
The judge*
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-20 02:53 p.m.
Not jury
bob78711newbob78711new
It does but, Would you agree that deciding whether a person intended to commit murder is for the jury not for you?
Brandon
Brandon 2025-05-20 03:29 p.m.
Yea , just stating my opinion
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-20 03:58 p.m.
@meowiitten

Your Honor, I move to strike the portion of the witness’s response characterizing the defendant’s actions as unjustified or unreasonable, as he admitted it was ‘just his opinion,’ and he is not qualified as an expert.
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-20 03:58 p.m.
Also Defence rests
bob78711newbob78711new
Also Defence rests
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-20 03:58 p.m.
@Mlexus
bob78711newbob78711new
@meowiitten Your Honor, I move to strike the portion of the witness’s response characterizing the defendant’s actions as unjustified or unreasonable, as he admitted it ...
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 04:48 p.m.
Its a lay witness opinion
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 04:48 p.m.
Overruled
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 04:48 p.m.
Not every opinion of a lay witness is inadmissible
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 04:48 p.m.
@Mlexus
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Its a lay witness opinion
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-20 04:53 p.m.
I’d like to state United States v. Garcia, 413 F.3d 201, 210 (2d Cir. 2005)

Lay opinion must not “usurp the role of the jury by providing conclusions that the jury is capable of drawing on its own.” Substituting you of course for the jury, also more pertinent

United States v. Wantuch, 525 F.3d 505, 515 (7th Cir. 2008)

Lay opinion “must not stray into speculation or suggest guilt based on improper reasoning.”

He did suggest guilt multiple times during the testimony regarding the state trooper.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 04:54 p.m.
This is a bench trial so the same standards applied to a jury do not strictly apply to me
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 04:54 p.m.
Also, I didn't find that it suggested anything in an improper way
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Also, I didn't find that it suggested anything in an improper way
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-20 05:19 p.m.
If I may your honor:
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 05:19 p.m.
No you may not
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 05:19 p.m.
I already ruled on it
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 05:19 p.m.
If you think there's an issue you can submit a motion before your closing argument
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 05:20 p.m.
So stop
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 05:20 p.m.
I don't want to hear it
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-20 05:20 p.m.
@Mlexus @bob78711new Do you have a witness to call?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Mlexus @bob78711new Do you have a witness to call?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-21 04:22 p.m.
@Mlexus
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-21 06:31 p.m.
oh
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-21 06:31 p.m.
will reply in 16h
bob78711newbob78711new
@Mlexus
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-22 02:49 a.m.
The State calls Trooper WaryFN to the stand.
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 06:13 p.m.
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 06:13 p.m.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-23 06:23 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has added @WaryFN to the case channel.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-23 06:23 p.m.
@WaryFN Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@WaryFN Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 06:30 p.m.
yea
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 06:31 p.m.
so no ingame questioning?
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-23 06:31 p.m.
No. Just proceed
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 06:42 p.m.
@WaryFN Can you please view Exhibit A in full. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csUR7pzsXSA
MlexusMlexus
@WaryFN Can you please view Exhibit A in full. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csUR7pzsXSA
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 06:43 p.m.
wagched
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 06:43 p.m.
watched
WaryFNWaryFN
watched
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 06:46 p.m.
At approximately 0:21 a state police vehicle is seen, is this your department issued vehicle?
MlexusMlexus
At approximately 0:21 a state police vehicle is seen, is this your department issued vehicle?
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 06:47 p.m.
ya
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 06:47 p.m.
You are the one driving it?
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 06:50 p.m.
yes
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 06:51 p.m.
And for what reason were you at the mersea car dealership at that time
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 06:52 p.m.
i heard gunfire
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 06:52 p.m.
and I went to investigate
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 06:53 p.m.
Did you see who the gunfire was coming from
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 06:55 p.m.
ok i withdraw that bcs i need to establish more
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 06:56 p.m.
@WaryFN when you arrived on scene, you exited your car, why?
MlexusMlexus
@WaryFN when you arrived on scene, you exited your car, why?
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 06:59 p.m.
to stop the guy that was actively shooting
WaryFNWaryFN
to stop the guy that was actively shooting
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 07:01 p.m.
that being the Defendant, datosok22?
MlexusMlexus
that being the Defendant, datosok22?
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 07:05 p.m.
yes
WaryFNWaryFN
to stop the guy that was actively shooting
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 07:58 p.m.
and where was he shooting at
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 07:58 p.m.
replied to wrong msg but question stands
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 08:03 p.m.
at me
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 08:03 p.m.
cus I died
WaryFNWaryFN
at me
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 08:07 p.m.
no i mean where was he shooting at before you died
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 08:22 p.m.
based on the video
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 08:22 p.m.
it looks like he was shooting at another civilian
WaryFNWaryFN
it looks like he was shooting at another civilian
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 08:24 p.m.
that civilian died and he was running away from the scene of the crime
WaryFNWaryFN
to stop the guy that was actively shooting
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 08:25 p.m.
@WaryFN can you elaborate on " to stop the guy that was actively shooting "; what were you going to do had you not been shot by the defendant?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 08:26 p.m.
ok i withdraw
WaryFNWaryFN
to stop the guy that was actively shooting
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-23 08:27 p.m.
@WaryFN did you have an idea of the course of actions you were going to take to " stop the guy " when you arrived
MlexusMlexus
@WaryFN can you elaborate on " to stop the guy that was actively shooting "; what were you going to do had you not been shot by the defendant?
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 09:31 p.m.
do what the state of mayflower gave me the power to do and take his life :🙏🏾:
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-23 09:32 p.m.
so he wouldn’t be able to harm anymore innocents
WaryFNWaryFN
do what the state of mayflower gave me the power to do and take his life :🙏🏾:
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-24 12:46 a.m.
ok and when you exited the car what happened
MlexusMlexus
ok and when you exited the car what happened
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-25 01:43 p.m.
I was shot and killed immediately
WaryFNWaryFN
I was shot and killed immediately
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-26 01:47 a.m.
By who
MlexusMlexus
By who
WaryFN
WaryFN 2025-05-30 10:44 a.m.
datosok22
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-30 08:36 p.m.
@meowiitten I am requesting your recusal from this case as established under Mayfl. Jud. Admin. R. 8 (d)(2)
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-30 08:37 p.m.
I can write up a formal motion if you wish but your opposing counsel in the sinister case
bob78711newbob78711new
@meowiitten I am requesting your recusal from this case as established under Mayfl. Jud. Admin. R. 8 (d)(2)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 08:38 p.m.
Whats my conflict of interest
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 08:38 p.m.
Like what is my interest in that case that is materially the same in this case
MlexusMlexus
By who
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 08:38 p.m.
Also please continue
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-30 08:39 p.m.
Eh
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-30 08:39 p.m.
evidence is enough
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-30 08:39 p.m.
@WaryFN no further questions, thank you
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-30 08:39 p.m.
@meowiitten
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
Like what is my interest in that case that is materially the same in this case
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-30 08:42 p.m.
I fear you may rule against my client in order to spite me as a result of anything going on in that case
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-30 08:43 p.m.
I am trying to protect my client
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 08:44 p.m.
I don't have an interest in this case
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 08:44 p.m.
I fear a lot of things, but a lot of them are not material
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 08:44 p.m.
I didn't think of this at all until you brought it up to me
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 08:45 p.m.
Regardless, the motion is denied
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-30 08:45 p.m.
i have no further witnesses btw
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-30 08:45 p.m.
@bob78711new do u want to cross or bring ur witness(s)
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-05-30 08:48 p.m.
@bob78711new Cross?
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@bob78711new Cross?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-30 08:48 p.m.
In a bit
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-30 08:48 p.m.
I’d like to cross when I have some more time
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-05-30 08:53 p.m.
can we get an estimate on when that is like within 3-5d
MlexusMlexus
can we get an estimate on when that is like within 3-5d
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-31 12:41 p.m.
It was today lol
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-05-31 12:41 p.m.
Last night I was out of the house
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-01 03:02 p.m.
@bob78711new I would assume you waive cross? Its been 2 days
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@bob78711new I would assume you waive cross? Its been 2 days
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-01 03:03 p.m.
Yeah
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-01 03:03 p.m.
Alright
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-01 03:03 p.m.
@bob78711new Do you have a witness to call
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@bob78711new Do you have a witness to call
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-01 03:03 p.m.
No
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-01 03:03 p.m.
@Mlexus You?
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-06-01 06:23 p.m.
no
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-01 06:52 p.m.
@Mlexus Give your closing arguments
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@Mlexus Give your closing arguments
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-06-02 01:20 a.m.
will do when home
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-06-02 01:20 a.m.
after a finding of guilt will you do sentencing hearing or no ( asking because some judges don’t ask for sentencing recommendations from either side and do it sua sponte )
Mlexus
Mlexus 2025-06-02 06:18 a.m.
Prosecutions Closing Statement.

Thank you your Honour and may it please the court;

We have seen through this trial evidence pertaining to the events that transpired on or about March 11th, 2002, shown primarily via Exhibit A and two supporting witnesses.

It is clear from the video, and backed up by witness testimony, that on Count I, First-Degree Murder, the Defendant shot and killed a clearly uniformed and identifiable State Trooper, WaryFN, without any lawful reason. The Trooper died as soon as he exited his marked police vehicle, unable to say anything or do anything other than drive into the Mersea Car Dealership and be mowed down by the Defendant.

Count II, Second-Degree Murder, is backed up by the actions of the Defendant in Count I. The beginning of Exhibit A shows the killing of gpo_eat following a shootout between the Defendant and the victim, and his intent to kill in this count is shown by his unlawful killing of the trooper in Count I. As to Count III, it is clear that the Defendant illegally discharged his firearm in the course of these two killings within Mersea City Limits. And, with a few - I say a few because of his rather inaccurate aim - bullets, assaulted multiple individuals with a deadly weapon, that being his firearm, meeting the expectations of Counts IV and V.

For the forgoing reasons the prosecution is hopeful your honour would find guilt against this criminal - cop killer -, for the safety of all Mayflowerians, Columbians, Landerians, Merseans, Clarkers, but not the Medfordians. Thank you your Honour.
CC: @meowiitten @bob78711new
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-02 12:15 p.m.
@bob78711new Go ahead
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
@bob78711new Go ahead
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-02 12:16 p.m.
Allow me some time to draft that motion to strike
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-02 12:16 p.m.
I am in class ATM
bob78711newbob78711new
Allow me some time to draft that motion to strike
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-02 03:05 p.m.
24 hours from that message
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-02 03:05 p.m.
So tomorrow at 12:16 PM EST is the deadline
sadoimpactosadoimpacto
24 hours from that message
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-02 03:05 p.m.
Alright
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-02 03:05 p.m.
Many thanks
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-03 02:05 p.m.
@meowiitten @Mlexus

Apologies for the tardyness your honor, I had some issues in my personal life regarding school which I had to attend to.

Courtesy link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HuOh4rTblvLVD57a8az1zhRKVQB6S05I/view?usp=sharing
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-03 02:05 p.m.
Also I will check but I dont think I am added to the case on the website so I will get the clerk to add this if you cant
bob78711newbob78711new
@meowiitten @Mlexus Apologies for the tardyness your honor, I had some issues in my personal life regarding school which I had to attend to. Courtesy lin...
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-03 02:09 p.m.
I'll sustain the objection to both, so it'll be disregarded
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-03 02:09 p.m.
@bob78711new Closing statement please
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-03 02:19 p.m.
Your Honor:
This case is not as clear cut as the prosecution would have you believe. And that means one thing in a honorable court of law such as this (glaze IK): a reasonable doubt.

On March 11th, my client, datosok22, entered a somewhat crazy and rapidly escalating situation. Shots had already been fired that way or this way between him and a civilian named gpo_eat; another two vehicles roared in almost at the same moment with lights and sirens.

With the adrenaline pumping, shots fired; with lives on the line, a split-second decision has to be made.

The prosecution wants to turn this into a cold-blooded killing. However, the evidence points at a human being reacting, so confused amidst an intense firefight that he or she did not know who was who, who was shooting, and what threat remained.

Even the agent from Mayflower Bureau of Investigation BrandonnLUV has under oath testified that he had not shot at anyone upon arrival since he himself did not know who was defending themselves.

That is a law enforcement officer who was supposed to know when to assess force telling this court that confusion reigned at that scene. If a trained agent did not know who was the aggressor then how could my client have known?

And let's be honest: nobody saw it; nobody could have. Now, the law does not state that the state of mind must be known; it does say that beyond a reasonable doubt criminal intent must be proven, and the state has not done that.

The Trooper even stated his intent to harm the defendant without knowing who was the aggressor.

Your honor at the end of the day this shows only human error in the preservation of life.
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-06-03 02:19 p.m.
Cc: @meowiitten @Mlexus
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-03 02:19 p.m.
Ok I will deliberate
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-03 05:51 p.m.
COURT VERDICT
@bob78711new @Mlexus
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-03 05:52 p.m.
COURT JUDGMENT
@bob78711new @Mlexus
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-03 05:53 p.m.
MINUTE ENTRY: Sentencing held on 06/03/2025 before Judge sadoimpacto as to datosok22 (1): Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Defendant sentenced to Five Hundred Thirty Nine (539) Minutes of Incarceration; Permanent Prohibition on the Possession, Shipment, Transport, or Receipt of Firearms or Ammunition Pursuant to 4 M.S.C. 5 § 4903; and Eight (8) Months of Delayed Expungement Eligibility Pursuant to 5 M.S.C. § 1503.1.
meowiitten pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:04 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-03 05:53 p.m.
May God have mercy on your soul. @opala
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-03 05:53 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has removed @opala from the case channel.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-03 05:53 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has removed @Mlexus from the case channel.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-03 05:53 p.m.
Case Modified
@meowiitten has removed @bob78711new from the case channel.
sadoimpactosadoimpacto used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-03 05:53 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-03 05:53 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-03 05:53 p.m.
sadoimpacto
sadoimpacto 2025-06-03 05:53 p.m.
@Prothonotary's Office Archive!
Exported 432 messages